ACLU: American Civil Liberties Union of Ohio
Keeping America Safe and Free

Juvenile Justice

Updated 12.15.11 Juvenile justice systems were created to protect young people’s rights and focus on education and rehabilitation rather than only punishment. Sadly, in recent years, we have drifted away from that purpose. Many of our youth fall victim to the school-to-prison pipeline, the policies and practices that funnel children out of schools and into the juvenile and criminal justice systems.

What's happening in Ohio


Protecting Children's Right to Counsel
The ACLU of Ohio, Office of the Ohio Public Defender, and Children’s Law Center urge the Ohio Supreme Court to adopt Juvenile Rule 3, a proposed administrative rule change that will ensure juveniles not waive their right to counsel without consulting an attorney.

Under current law, children must speak with an adult before they waive their right to counsel. However, the adult may be a parent or guardian who does not understand the legal system. Consequently, children often waive counsel without fully understanding their rights or the potential outcome of proceeding through the juvenile justice system without an attorney.

If Juvenile Rule 3 is adopted, it will add necessary protections to ensure children have unfettered access to an attorney. Children would only be allowed to waive if:

  • They have consulted with an attorney who will advise them of the rights and consequences of waiving; and,
  • The waiver is made knowingly and intelligently after the judge has given detailed instructions in writing and on the record.

The public comment period closed on November 22, 2011. The Court may amend the proposed rules, and then file them with the Ohio General Assembly. The rules go into effect on July 1, 2012, unless the General Assembly passes a motion of disapproval prior to that date.

For more information, download the ACLU's one page sheet here.
Read the ACLU of Ohio’s testimony in support of Juvenile Rule 3.


Changing the System
The Ohio Legislature passed House Bill 86, which made needed changes to Ohio juvenile justice and criminal justice systems. The legislation focuses on restoring discretion to Ohio juvenile court judges to treat children on a case-by-case basis by:

  • Allowing a juvenile court to grant judicial release to children in custody of the Ohio Department of Youth Services after the expiration of their minimum term;
  • Establishing a competency standard for juveniles;
  • Reducing the maximum sentence for a crime with a gun specification for youth who did not provide, use, or dispose of the firearm; and
  • Permitting youth to be transferred back to juvenile court if they were subject to mandatory transfer to adult court due to the charged offense, but plead guilty or are convicted of a lesser offense.


Juvenile Justice System Failing Ohio's Children

Ohio’s juvenile justice system is plagued by unfairness and inefficiency, including youth waiver of counsel, routine shackling of children, disproportionate minority contact, and mandates that children accused of certain crimes be charged as adults. The ACLU of Ohio and its partners have released an updated version of "Report Card: Evaluating Juvenile Justice in Ohio" focusing on these issues.

The Report Card is an outgrowth of a partnership between the ACLU of Ohio, the National ACLU, the Children’s Law Center and the Ohio Public Defender to investigate the extraordinarily high rates at which Ohio youth waived their right to counsel in delinquency proceedings. Ultimately, the Ohio Supreme Court issued new guidelines through in Re: Spears to help ensure youth are adequately advised of their rights before waiving their right to counsel.

The ACLU of Ohio continues to monitor the effect of these new guidelines, and recently filed a legal brief in support of one youth whose right to counsel was violated in the case, In Re. M.W. For more information, visit our legal docket.


Technology: Defending Young People’s Rights Online and
with Cell Phones

Our laws have not kept pace with the rapid growth of technology. Nowhere is this more evident than the criminalization of young people’s speech. The ACLU of Ohio believes young people are free to express themselves online and through cell phones, and we work to ensure that teens are not subject to illegal searches or unjust punishments for their expression.

More information about students rights online or with cell phones is available on our Students Get Active page.


Resources

Visit our Criminal Justice, Police Practices, and Racial Justice, and Students Get Active issues pages for more information about youth rights and our justice system.

Check out our Publications page for more resources on juvenile justice and youth rights.

Defending Clients Who Have Been Searched and Interrogated at School: A Guide for Juvenile Defenders, The National Juvenile Defender Center, 2009

Guide to Sealing and Expunging Juvenile Court Records, Office of the Ohio Public Defender

Media and Technology Resources for Educators, Commonsense Media

School-to-Prison-Pipeline Issue Page, American Civil Liberties Union

The Cost of Confinement: Why Good Juvenile Justice Policies Make Good Fiscal Sense, The Justice Policy Institute, May 2009

Voices for Ohio’s Children – Juvenile Justice Initiative, Research and publications on juvenile detention in Ohio

Find juvenile justice articles and press releases via our News Center.

Browse our webcasts for juvenile justice-related programs:
Audio webcasts
Video webcasts