|

Why the ACLU of Ohio Opposes Sex Segregated Schools
Sex-segregated schools violate the very principal established in the
US Supreme Court’s landmark 1954 unanimous decision in Brown v.
Board of Education that struck down the idea of “separate but
equal.” The Court found that under no circumstances can segregated
schools be equal because it is impossible to guarantee that facilities,
courses, teachers and other materials will be distributed evenly among
students. In his written opinion, Chief Justice Earl Warren also pointed
to the importance of integration in providing students with a rounded
social experience.
Racial segregation of the schools was based on outdated racial
stereotypes that suggested white and African American children learned
differently and could not study in the same classroom. Sex segregation
is simply the same concept repackaged with a new set of outdated
stereotypes—this time about gender.
Proponents of sex segregated schools incorporate several outdated gender
concepts into suggested curricula for the schools. In some districts,
teachers have been instructed that they cannot look boys in the eyes or
smile at them, girls only perform well on math tests during certain days
of their menstrual cycle when their estrogen is surging and that boys
should have rigorous physical exercise while girls are relegated to
“lifestyles” courses.
School administrators in the 1950’s rightly realized that segregated
classrooms can never be equal and the same holds true today. Segregating
young people based on sex violates the 14th Amendment to the U.S.
Constitution and it threatens to undo much of what was accomplished
under Title IX and cause even more inequality in the schools.
By segregating schools, students may have vastly different experiences
within the same school district. Whether it is access to special
mentoring programs, the prevalence of new materials and technology at
the school, the amount of academic time given to each classroom or the
quality of the curriculum, school districts run the risk of providing
unequal opportunities to one group of students over another.
There is no comprehensive scientific study that shows sex segregated
schools directly improve students’ success. Instead, gimmicks like sex
segregated schools serve as smokescreens for the real problems blighting
many schools: lack of resources, availability of technology, safety and
appearance of schools, prevalence of highly qualified teachers, class
size and challenging coursework.

What's happening nationally
The ACLU Women's Rights Project, in coalition with ACLU affiliates,
has through litigation and other advocacy challenged sex-segregated
schools in multiple states. In August 2006, the ACLU brought a major
court case in Louisiana against proposed sex-segregated schools that
would be based on ideas such as boys should be taught how to be
"heroic," while girls should be instructed in "good character." The
ACLU also revealed that the research the schools were relying on
promoted ideas like teachers should not look male students in the eye or
smile at them, and girls are only adept at math theory during the few
days in their menstrual cycle while their estrogen is surging. The day
after the ACLU filed suit, the school district abandoned its plans.
To read more about the Women’s Rights Project’s work on sex-segregated
schools, go to
http://www.aclu.org/womensrights/edu/index.html
What's Happening Locally
In July 2007, the ACLU of Ohio began an investigation into a proposal
by the Cleveland Municipal School District to create five sex-segregated
schools. Read the press release.
The ACLU issued a public records request to the school district asking
for any documents pertaining to the procedures and protocols that will
be implemented at the schools, as well as any information on how the
district came to the decision to implement these schools.
Read the
public records request.
Resources
Check out the ACLU’s answers to some of the most
Frequently Asked
Questions about sex-segregated schools.
For more information about what experts say will contribute to a
school’s academic success,
read this August 2006 report by the Buckeye Institute on Public
Policy Solutions.
|