|
04.21.06
ACLU Victorious in Challenge to Ohio's Punch
Card Ballots
CLEVELAND, OH -- Today, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of
Ohio Foundation, Inc. and the ACLU’s Voting Rights Project announced
victory in its constitutional challenge to the State of Ohio’s use of
punch-card ballot voting technology.
In a forty-seven page decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth
Circuit agreed with the ACLU that Ohio’s use of punch card ballots in
some counties but not others violates the Equal Protection Clause of the
Fourteenth Amendment. The Sixth Circuit also found that punch card
ballots deprive voters of their due process right to have their votes
counted accurately. Finally, the Sixth Circuit vacated the District
Court’s judgment regarding the ACLU’s claim under the Voting Rights Act
and remanded the issue back to that court. That claim involves the
ACLU’s contention that the use of punch card ballots in Hamilton,
Montgomery, and Summit Counties violates the Voting Rights Act because
of their disparate impact on African-American voters.
“For over three years the State of Ohio has been promising new voting
equipment, but failing to deliver. This ruling means that the state can
no longer drag its feet,” stated Daniel Tokaji who argued the case
before the Sixth Circuit. “This ruling also sends a strong message to
Ohio and every other state that inequalities in the voting process will
no longer be tolerated,” added Tokaji.
The ACLU filed suit in October 2002 in the wake of the U.S. Supreme
Court’s decision in Bush v. Gore. In the 2000 general election,
sixty-nine of Ohio’s eighty-eight counties utilized punch-card ballots
resulting in thousands of uncounted votes. In its research, the ACLU was
able to show Ohio voters using punch-card ballots were four times as
likely to not have their votes counted as voters using reliable
electronic voting equipment.
In light of today’s decision by the Sixth Circuit, the case will now
return to the U.S. District Court in Akron, where
Judge David Dowd ruled against the ACLU in December 2004, for future
proceedings regarding the ACLU’s claim under the Voting Rights Act.
Text of the decision
|