State ex rel. Corwin v. Ohio Department of Health
League of Women Voters vs. LaRose (SB293)
Brust v. Ohio Parole Board
The Ohio Parole Board’s policy of denying access to victim statements precludes meaningful consideration because it prevents individuals seeking parole from knowing about, rebutting, or responding to information that is being considered by the Board.
Parents Defending Education v. Olentangy Local School District Board of Education, et al. (amicus)
Madeline Moe, et al. v. Dave Yost, et al.
Minor Plaintiffs and their parents challenge HB 68, Ohio’s ban on gender affirming care for minors.
State v. Tolbert (amicus)
Law enforcement is increasingly using artificial intelligence, including facial recognition technology to investigate crimes. However, the use of such technology to identify a suspect is akin to relying on an anonymous informant, which in and of itself is insufficient to establish probable cause.
State ex Rel. Rosnick v. Geauga County Sheriff
State ex rel. Rosnick v. Seneca County Sheriff
Christensen v. Carter, et al.