Privacy

Improvements in technology, combined with a weakening of our legal protections, have resulted in unprecedented government power.

alt" "

Improvements in technology, combined with a weakening of our legal protections, have resulted in unprecedented government power.

The ACLU of Ohio advocates for a transparent, accountable government and an open, free society. We believe that significant improvements in technology paired with a weakening of our legal protections put these core principles at risk when left unchecked. The ACLU of Ohio continues to be an outspoken critic of oversurveillance and its infringement on privacy rights and civil liberties. Our work centers on raising concerns regarding the increasing prevalence of technology use within the criminal justice system, including the expansion of license-plate readers and facial recognition platforms. When these devices are utilized without guardrails or specific attention paid to privacy concerns, they can lead to unprecedented overreach and over-policing.

The ACLU of Ohio is a strong supporter of the Community Control Over Police Surveillance (CCOPS) initiative, which aims to pass local laws and ordinances to ensure residents are empowered to decide if and how surveillance technologies are used. Increased police surveillance without public oversight threatens civil liberties, particularly for the country’s most marginalized, including immigrants and BIPOC and LGBTQ+ communities. Individuals participating in protests or public dissent may also be at risk. By maximizing communities’ influence over laws regarding surveillance technologies, we can increase transparency within law enforcement and protect the rights and privacy of all Ohioans.

The Latest

News & Commentary
alt" "

Police Surveillance and Civil Liberties

Police surveillance is particularly concerning not only because it infringes on privacy, but also because it comes with enforcement power.
Press Release
The words 'Press Release' in white font in a red rectangle on a navy background

ACLU of Ohio Files Amicus Brief, Raising Concerns about Use of Facial Recognition Technology in Issuance of a Search Warrant

Today, the American Civil Liberties Union, the ACLU of Ohio, and the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers filed a brief as amicus curiae to Ohio’s 8th District Court of Appeals on behalf of Appellee Qeyeon Tolbert in State v. Tolbert.
Issue Areas: Privacy, Public Safety
News & Commentary
ohio statehouse graphic with red podium and microphone

Am. House Bill 78 – Interested Party Testimony

The ACLU of Ohio’s main concern with HB 78 is the lack of specific privacy protections in the bill for your constituents.
News & Commentary
Blue and white Photograph of a police officer's chest, with the name tag, body cam, badge, and radio in black

Police Identities Hidden Under Victims’ Rights Law: Marsy’s Law and access to police records

A transparent government can be an accountable government.
Court Case
Jul 22, 2025

State v. Tolbert (amicus)

Law enforcement is increasingly using artificial intelligence, including facial recognition technology to investigate crimes. However, the use of such technology to identify a suspect is akin to relying on an anonymous informant, which in and of itself is insufficient to establish probable cause.
Court Case
Jul 23, 2020

In re CVS Pharmacy, Inc. (amicus)

Court Case
Nov 25, 2019

State v. Anderson and State v. Chapman (amicus)

Court Case
Nov 25, 2019

Stegmaier DHS Petition