Christensen v. Carter, et al.
Planned Parenthood Southwest Ohio v. Ohio Department of Health
Equitas Health v. State
The passage of this law by inclusion in the budget bill violates Ohio’s “single-subject” rule. In addition, the law is unconstitutionally vague.
Preterm-Cleveland, et al. v. Yost, et al.
In re: Shahani Children (amicus)
Ohio lags behind other states in denying legal standing to unmarried, non-biological parents. Many states have abandoned biological interpretations of “parent” in shared parenting statutes, while others have adopted “de-facto parent” doctrines to allow same-sex couples to establish parentage claims.
Madeline Moe, et al. v. Dave Yost, et al.
Minor Plaintiffs and their parents challenge HB 68, Ohio's ban on gender affirming care for minors.
Planned Parenthood Southwest Ohio v. Yost
In 2021 Ohio passed S.B. 260, a law prohibiting telemedicine abortions. Medication abortions are safe and effective whether they are performed in a medical office or at home. S.B. 260 violates the new constitutional prohibition on unnecessary legal burdens on reproductive healthcare.
State ex rel. Rosnick v. Seneca County Sheriff
Doe No. 1, et al. v. Bethel Local School District Board of Education, et al.