State ex rel. Corwin v. Ohio Department of Health
League of Women Voters vs. LaRose (SB293)
Brust v. Ohio Parole Board
The Ohio Parole Board’s policy of denying access to victim statements precludes meaningful consideration because it prevents individuals seeking parole from knowing about, rebutting, or responding to information that is being considered by the Board.
Women’s Med. Dayton et al. v. Vanderhoff et al.
Preterm-Cleveland, et al. v. Yost, et al.
Parents Defending Education v. Olentangy Local School District Board of Education, et al. (amicus)
Madeline Moe, et al. v. Dave Yost, et al.
Minor Plaintiffs and their parents challenge HB 68, Ohio's ban on gender affirming care for minors.
Preterm-Cleveland, et al. v. Yost, et al. (waiting period challenge)
Ohio law burdens people seeking an abortion with a set of onerous, medically unnecessary, and sometimes harmful prerequisites to obtaining that abortion. This set of restrictions violates the new constitutional amendment guaranteeing abortion rights in the state.