State v. Tolbert (amicus)
Law enforcement is increasingly using artificial intelligence, including facial recognition technology to investigate crimes. However, the use of such technology to identify a suspect is akin to relying on an anonymous informant, which in and of itself is insufficient to establish probable cause.
Petitt v. Morrow, et al.
Nick Petitt filmed a Columbus Police SWAT team from his porch. Officers then entered onto Mr. Petitt’s property unlawfully, attacked him, arrested him, and seized his phone, in violation of the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments.
Abdur-Rahim et al. v. City of Columbus et al.
Columbus police officers violated the Fourth Amendment prohibition on excessive use of force and the First Amendment rights to speech and assembly when they targeted and pepper sprayed peaceful, unarmed protesters who were in the process of complying with dispersal orders.
ACLU of Ohio, et al. v. City of Cleveland, et al.
City of Cleveland v. Alvin Williams and City of Cleveland v. Chanel Christian
In Re Cincinnati Policing 209 F.R.D. 395 (S.D. Ohio 2003)
Clements v. City of Cleveland, No. 94-CV-2074 (N.D. Ohio, 1994)
City of Canton, Ohio v. Harris 489 U.S. 378 (1989)
Terry v. Ohio 392 U.S. 1 (1968)