On April 24, 2019, Nick Petitt was standing on the front porch of his Columbus home. He had come out because he heard a disturbance in his neighborhood: approximately 6 members of a Columbus Police SWAT team were across the street serving a search warrant at a neighboring home; more police cars and officers were further down his street. SWAT was evacuating and then questioning a family, a grandmother and two grandchildren, whom Mr. Petitt knew as his neighbors. Concerned, Mr. Petitt took out his cellphone and began filming the interaction while standing on his porch. He recorded the police mistreating his neighbors, including smacking the compliant teenaged grandson on the face. Mr. Petitt told the police to stop it, and said that he had them on camera. The officers told him to go inside. He did not, and kept filming.

In response, Officers Kenneth Dale and Glenn Thivener, and their commanding Sergeant, James Morrow, of the Columbus Police Department, clad in SWAT gear and carrying automatic rifles, crossed the street, opened Mr. Petitt’s gate, and marched through his yard and onto his porch, yelling at him to get back into his house. Then they slammed him down, threatened him, took his phone, roughed him up, and arrested him. Mr. Petitt spent five days in jail before being charged under R.C. 2317.13(a)(1), Misconduct at an Emergency. Those charges were later dropped by the Columbus City prosecutor on the basis of insufficient evidence. Mr. Petitt suffered physical and emotional harm in addition to the violation of his constitutional rights

Legal Theory

Speech and expressive conduct, including the right to film and to criticize the police, are protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. In attacking Mr. Petitt, arresting and charging him without probable cause, and seizing his phone, the police retaliated against him for having exercised his First Amendment rights. Additionally, in entering onto Mr. Petitt’s property unlawfully, attacking him, arresting him, and seizing his phone, the police violated the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment prohibitions on the excessive use of force and against unlawful seizure.

Status Update

We filed a complaint for compensatory and punitive damages on January 11, 2021.  The City filed its Answer on April 23. We reached a settlement and filed a notice of settlement with the Court on May 4. On May 20 the Court entered a F.R.C.P. 68 judgment entry against the City and dismissed the case. The City of Columbus paid Mr. Petitt $20,000. 

Date filed

January 11, 2021


Southern District of Ohio



Case number